Ease Matters: Four Principles for Coaching Teams
The hardest part of coaching teams is remembering that it doesn’t have to be hard. I’m not responsible for fixing, saving, making sure they do something they’ve never done before, or having the epiphany that unlocks all confusions. No cape needed. No magic elixir. Not even a gentle prod to corral them back to their agreed upon agenda. More difficult and easier than all of that is the relaxed attention that allows me to see them as they are.
Four principles guide my work: seeing systems, stating what is so, appreciation, and the paradoxical theory of change.
Seeing Systems
First, they are a system. The group works as it does because of what all the parts are doing in relationship with each other. Rather than blaming the leader for the dysfunction of the group or seeing someone as the recalcitrant obstacle to the group’s effectiveness, I can soften my gaze and see them as working in concert to create the dynamic I am witnessing.
They are a whole. Each contributes to the way the team works. If one is chronically late or misses deadlines, the others allow it or make excuses. If two are in regular conflict, the remainder willingly, perhaps unwittingly, act in relief or superiority that they are not the ones in conflict, even if they quietly take a side. A system has no sides. Rather it is a vibrant expression of its parts in motion. Just as I cannot enjoy the car’s accelerator without also appreciating the brake, it makes no sense to prefer only part of a team.
Not easy, but so useful, to remember that each person is contributing to the whole. And that the entire team is what I am supporting. The language of wholes helps me – the team is…, together the group does…. I also find metaphor useful, as in, I see this group as a rocket working hard to escape the gravitational pull of the old habits towards a new way of working. Or simple descriptors for the group, e.g., polite, measured, lively, loud, focused on productivity, etc.
Stating What Is So.
If this seems too simple, I come to my second love and helper, phenomenology. Oh, the big words! It just means seeing what is right here. Naming what is in front of me, what I witness the group doing and sometimes the experience I have of the group. When I tell a group that I experience them as polite or fast paced I am inviting them into a reflection of whether that is true for them, whether they like it, when and how it serves their purpose. They may not identify with the term at all and instead claim something more to their liking – they see themselves as methodical or considerate or efficient. All good. They reflect on an aspect of their experience and then can choose whether they want to keep it or change it, by a little or a lot.
Appreciation
My next helper, the power of appreciation, is an essential partner, especially to naming what I see. Most groups in coaching are both vulnerable and defensive. They have asked me in because they believe something is not working, yet they are effective to the extent they are. How dare an interloper hurl judgment without the benefit of having walked with them? Seeing their behaviors as adaptive habits that allow them to act on their priorities is essential. I have seen repeatedly how teams are happy to be recognized for what they know is their excellence. Their defensiveness drops a little. They look at each other sometimes with sheepish pride. Yes, we do that, don’t we? Or with relish, That’s right, we’re good at it. To be seen for what is not common across teams feels good. Sometimes, they blow by it, yeah, but what about what we don’t do so well? Which is an opportunity to linger until the noticing sinks in and they can own the utility of their habit.
The Paradoxical Theory of Change
This brings me to the magic of this approach, the paradoxical theory of change. People and groups don’t change by trying to be other than they are but by acknowledging and fully accepting what they are already doing and being.
Rather than push away the politeness or the speed or the brusqueness or disorder or ruthless efficiency or any other habit of work that has its limits, teams can explore how they already are, how it serves them, what choices they’ve made and why. They will come to know viscerally and collectively, that any way of working or being has utility and limits. With appreciation for what works they are no longer fighting themselves. Instead, they can then choose an option that expands their practice repertoire rather than self-flagellation for how they are inadequate. The shift in attitudinal orientation means they change from working against themselves to expanding into a natural next. Ease matters.
All of this is remarkably simple but not easy. As a coach and facilitator, I remind myself that I am not there to fix, to make them or me different from what we already are. Rather, through appreciating them as a system already doing easily recognizable and effective actions, they take that perspective on themselves and more readily open to additional ways of working.









