Celebrating Success and Bearing Disappointment

Stuart N. Simon, LICSW, MCC • October 20, 2026

Some Thoughts on Further Development of the Cape Cod Model

Sonia Nevis, protégé and colleague of Fritz Perls, co-founder of the Gestalt International Study Center, co-creator of The Cape Cod Model. (CCM) and mentor to so many of us, regularly implored us to not be satisfied with our theory. She wanted us to regularly see what could be added or changed or amended. It is in that spirit that I found myself revisiting a muse that regularly tugs at the sleeve of my awareness…for all the attention the CCM invites to “What Is” and “What Else?”, do we pay enough attention to the client’s potential emotional experience of “What’s Missing”?

As a practitioner, therapist, coach, consultant and trainer who embraces and teaches The Cape Cod Model (CCM), I am committed to it as an optimistic approach to helping individuals, couples, work teams and families grow, develop and become more successful. My active engagement with the CCM is built on years of seeing how it supports clients to mobilize their intention to grow, develop and become more successful at their chosen endeavor. This is done by inviting the client or client system to fully immerse themselves in their present experience…a very Gestalt intervention of noticing “What Is”. The result of simply inviting attention to “what is” embodies the potential for growth and development and can typically lead to a sense of accomplishment or pride…particularly when the practitioner invites the client to see the value is what was likely a heretofore unappreciated, disowned or disliked behavior.  However, it has occurred to me lately that what does not get articulated with enough emphasis, and at times is even overlooked, is the full experience of the client in the process of noticing “what is missing”, what they aren’t doing, or are presently unable to do. And I worry that sometimes we forget or never even consider that this awareness can  result in disappointment, embarrassment, and even shame.


As the reader will see from the brief scenarios below, and as noted above, practitioners of the CCM invite the client or client system to fully immerse themselves in their present experience…focusing on “What Is”. That simple process of inviting attention can often lead to a stunning awareness and celebration of the value of the present behavior. However, as noted above, at times it can result in the client having to cope with some amount of disappointment, embarrassment, perhaps even shame. And that by not appreciating, or worse, ignoring the disappointment, we potentially do the client a disservice.


Perhaps some examples from my own experience will clarify:

 

  • A  26 yo young man came for therapy feeling depressed and confused. What I learned was that he had quit his 6-figure job and moved into his parents’ home. He had spent months alone in his room unsuccessfully being able to a “figure out” by himself how to move forward in his life. He became so distraught and frustrated by not being able to “figure it out”, that he had taken a baseball bat and destroyed a TV. I engaged with him by first inviting him to see the remarkable independence he valued and exhibited. And this awareness led him to feel seen and understood and pleased for his independence. However, he quickly discovered the grief and disappointment that his approach was not sufficient for achieving the awareness and problem solving he wished to do on his own, and actually sobbed deeply.


  • A manager in a commercial bank recounted her struggle with a direct report who was  so detail oriented that the work was exemplary but unfortunately always delivered late to the customer. When the manager learned to first support and celebrate her employee’s attention to detail, both manager and employee did indeed celebrate. However, it was necessary for the employee to recognize the cost of such attention was leading to her failure. And doing so offered her a path forward to success. And while her hyper attention to detail was a significant source of pride, this new awareness of her over reliance on submitting detailed efforts led to significant distress by the employee.


  • In working with a couple that came for psychotherapy, one of whom was a psychotherapist. It quickly became evident that each of them was quite articulate in explaining why they were unhappy with their partner’s behavior. However, as a couple, their connection was limited as they were unable to suspend their own disappointment in order to learn from the other. And while they were pleased to learn an approach that might support their marriage going forward they were embarrassed to realize their limited skill at listening to the other.

 

 

What am I actually suggesting here?  I’m proposing that a more complete model would have the practitioner specifically engage the client with inquiry about their emotional experience of what is missing. And this is because the emotional responses of the clients above…the young man’s tears, the direct reports distress, or the couples embarrassment, will not always be as apparent. Yet it is often present. And without a specific invitation to reflect on it, there is a risk of not raising to awareness a potentially new and meaningful “What is.”


Perhaps a final example will further clarify my point. Years ago, at the beginning of the 1st week of the Cape Cod Training Program, one of my colleagues and I were asked by Sonia to be a demonstration couple: Sonia would work with us in front of the assembled participants, and they would get to see a master working with the model. And so we did. I remember the enthusiasm my “partner” and I had as we energetically took turns bringing each other up to date on the previous 6 months of our lives. In line with the model, at some point Sonia interrupted, and with a warm smile she pointed out to how enthusiastically we seemed to be enjoying telling each other things. Which we were. And the very next moment I could feel my embarrassment that neither on of us had asked the other a single question. And of course this is what Sonia wished for us to know was less-developed in our relationship: that we seemed much more interested in “telling,” and that “asking “was not present. And while I was glad to see the ways that adding curiosity would make our relationship more complete, I have carried with me all of these years the nagging memory of being embarrassed it was missing. And I believe that had I been invited to articulate this embarrassment, my memory would be kinder and more forgiving.


About the Author

Stuart N. Simon is the Co-Director of Coaching at GISC. A Gestalt practitioner with over thirty years of experience as a therapist, coach, consultant and trainer, Stuart is a partner at Management Support Services, Inc., and maintains a private practice in psychotherapy and coaching in Newton, MA. He is also a consultant, coach and trainer for the Corporate Education Group© and holds the ICF Master Certified Coach credential.

By Allison Iantosca, PCC • September 14, 2026
This is a post about leadership development. From a leader (who has done a lot of study at GISC.) But to make the very point I seek to convey, it would be a little ironic to start with the assumption that I’m here to tell you how it should be done. So, let’s start somewhere else. I am a collector of leadership experiences. With twenty-five years behind me, I know something about the weight of the quiet decisions leaders make every day— the ones that shape culture, build or bust relationships, promote or penalize revenue goals. I also do recognize those moments when who you are becomes inseparable from how you lead because, eventually, every leadership challenge becomes an identity challenge. Those are the moments that interest me now: when what happens inside us deserves as much attention as what’s happening around us; when experience isn’t enough and certainty isn’t available; when relational intelligence and self-awareness may serve us better than year-over-year stretch goals or a beautifully reconciled balance sheet. So, for the sake of argument... let’s agree to stop thinking great leadership means having it “all figured out”. In fact, let’s say that leadership expands in direct proportion to our willingness to become more fully ourselves, and stop trying to become more like someone else we admire: more confident, more decisive, more polished, more whatever quality we think we should mimic to strengthen our effectiveness. I spent plenty of my leadership days worried that what I felt was true and natural to me was not potent or even worth considering. But the deeper in I got, the less convinced I was that leadership was about becoming like someone else and the more convinced I became that it was actually about seeing clearly who I already was and what I already had. It may seem counterintuitive, but we don’t actually grow by starting with what we don’t have. Much of what we read and listen to tells us to set goals of becoming and, even, thinking like the leaders we want to someday be. Though well intended, these messages push us so far away from what instinctively lives in us that we set ourselves up to, in fact, become worse leaders! For example, if I lean into my curiosity and ask a lot of questions, I might find advice about micromanaging. If I show care for my workforce, I might wonder if I am unable to give criticism. If I like everyone to weigh in on decisions, I may appear, God forbid, wishy washy. I might begin to worry about the way “I am supposed to be” and, to counter those judgments, I over index to stifle my questions or focus on pointing out weaknesses with critical fervor. I might try to hide the glory of my instincts behind unfamiliar behaviors without knowing I am doing so. In working so hard to fight my instincts, I ignore what I started with. To deepen myself as a whole leader then, my task is not correction but awareness—not judgment, but a widening of sight. Because awareness creates space, and in that space, choice and possibility materialize. When I truly see how deeply I value one way of being—when I recognize it as a default and feel how firmly it is mine—only then do I have the steadiness and courage to risk and explore something different. These are the anchoring tendrils of a leadership philosophy: awareness, wholeness, curiosity, range, choice. We bundle them into programmatic exploration as a learning center— Courage and Change , Relational Intelligence . Learning spaces that let you slow down enough to pay attention to the story of leadership you think you know: What is your natural leadership style? What is behavioral habit and why? What messages did you receive about what a leader should be? Which of those messages still serve you? Which ones are costing you? What will it take to change? In seeing what is happening. In noticing what is driving you. In trusting there is more to what feels most naturally true about you…not your title, resume, degree…but that characteristic of you that can’t be removed no matter how hard you try… You begin to see that leadership doesn't happen somewhere else as much as it happens inside of you. Every time you are aware enough to expand your range, you create one more way of meeting the people and the moments before you. The courage to change. Perhaps that's all leadership has ever asked — not our either/or, but our both/and. Come explore.
By Lucy Ball, BAHons • July 27, 2026
During Covid lockdown, Melanie Nevis and I founded a Book Club. It was my first and favourite Book Club. Here's what I loved about it. There were only two members. Me and Melanie.
We sent each other homework, for example to read a chapter before our next meeting.
One of us regularly failed to do our homework or forgot what we had read. And it never mattered.
What mattered most was that we took care of each other during a difficult time.
By Heather Berthoud • July 8, 2026
The hardest part of coaching teams is remembering that it doesn’t have to be hard. I’m not responsible for fixing, saving, making sure they do something they’ve never done before, or having the epiphany that unlocks all confusions. No cape needed. No magic elixir. Not even a gentle prod to corral them back to their agreed upon agenda. More difficult and easier than all of that is the relaxed attention that allows me to see them as they are. Four principles guide my work: seeing systems, stating what is so, appreciation, and the paradoxical theory of change. Seeing Systems First, they are a system. The group works as it does because of what all the parts are doing in relationship with each other. Rather than blaming the leader for the dysfunction of the group or seeing someone as the recalcitrant obstacle to the group’s effectiveness, I can soften my gaze and see them as working in concert to create the dynamic I am witnessing. They are a whole. Each contributes to the way the team works. If one is chronically late or misses deadlines, the others allow it or make excuses. If two are in regular conflict, the remainder willingly, perhaps unwittingly, act in relief or superiority that they are not the ones in conflict, even if they quietly take a side. A system has no sides. Rather it is a vibrant expression of its parts in motion. Just as I cannot enjoy the car’s accelerator without also appreciating the brake, it makes no sense to prefer only part of a team. Not easy, but so useful, to remember that each person is contributing to the whole. And that the entire team is what I am supporting. The language of wholes helps me – the team is…, together the group does…. I also find metaphor useful, as in, I see this group as a rocket working hard to escape the gravitational pull of the old habits towards a new way of working. Or simple descriptors for the group, e.g., polite, measured, lively, loud, focused on productivity, etc. Stating What Is So . If this seems too simple, I come to my second love and helper, phenomenology. Oh, the big words! It just means seeing what is right here. Naming what is in front of me, what I witness the group doing and sometimes the experience I have of the group. When I tell a group that I experience them as polite or fast paced I am inviting them into a reflection of whether that is true for them, whether they like it, when and how it serves their purpose. They may not identify with the term at all and instead claim something more to their liking – they see themselves as methodical or considerate or efficient. All good. They reflect on an aspect of their experience and then can choose whether they want to keep it or change it, by a little or a lot. Appreciation My next helper, the power of appreciation, is an essential partner, especially to naming what I see. Most groups in coaching are both vulnerable and defensive. They have asked me in because they believe something is not working, yet they are effective to the extent they are. How dare an interloper hurl judgment without the benefit of having walked with them? Seeing their behaviors as adaptive habits that allow them to act on their priorities is essential. I have seen repeatedly how teams are happy to be recognized for what they know is their excellence. Their defensiveness drops a little. They look at each other sometimes with sheepish pride. Yes, we do that, don’t we? Or with relish, That’s right, we’re good at it. To be seen for what is not common across teams feels good. Sometimes, they blow by it, yeah, but what about what we don’t do so well? Which is an opportunity to linger until the noticing sinks in and they can own the utility of their habit. The Paradoxical Theory of Change This brings me to the magic of this approach, the paradoxical theory of change. People and groups don’t change by trying to be other than they are but by acknowledging and fully accepting what they are already doing and being. Rather than push away the politeness or the speed or the brusqueness or disorder or ruthless efficiency or any other habit of work that has its limits, teams can explore how they already are, how it serves them, what choices they’ve made and why. They will come to know viscerally and collectively, that any way of working or being has utility and limits. With appreciation for what works they are no longer fighting themselves. Instead, they can then choose an option that expands their practice repertoire rather than self-flagellation for how they are inadequate. The shift in attitudinal orientation means they change from working against themselves to expanding into a natural next. Ease matters. All of this is remarkably simple but not easy. As a coach and facilitator, I remind myself that I am not there to fix, to make them or me different from what we already are. Rather, through appreciating them as a system already doing easily recognizable and effective actions, they take that perspective on themselves and more readily open to additional ways of working.
By Diane Shannon, MD, MPH, PCC • May 5, 2026
Eric (not his real name) engaged me as a coach because he was struggling with self-doubt, fueled by self-criticism. In his 40s, he was watching work colleagues with less experience expressing themselves with confidence, while he felt self-conscious when sharing his ideas or kept mute. He felt he “didn’t deserve a seat at the table.” In one of our first sessions, he shared an experience from the prior weekend, when a group of friends and their partners gathered at his home. He described one guest as “boastful and annoying,” but respected the man’s ability to state his opinions boldly. From my perspective, Eric was not typical of my clients in terms of industry or gender. Most of my clients are women physicians struggling with job burnout. But I trusted that my training as a Gestalt coach at GISC gave me the skills and competence to coach clients outside my usual niche effectively.
By lfitzpatrick • December 5, 2025
Dear Friends, Thank you for your ongoing support of GISC and for being an essential part of our global learning community. Each year, I’m reminded that GISC thrives because of the people who believe in our mission and commit themselves to creating a better world. Those who know GISC know what powerful catalysts self-awareness, personal growth, and embodying a Gestalt approach can be for creating positive change. This past year, we settled into our downtown Boston offices at the Nonprofit Center—a building dedicated to nonprofit advancement and social change. It is a fitting home for GISC, reflecting the values, vibrancy, and connection essential to our own mission:
August 19, 2025
An Interview with GISC's Co-Directors of Leadership Development
July 2, 2025
This fall, GISC’s renowned Cape Cod Training Program (CCTP) returns to Europe, bringing its powerful learning model to London. Here, faculty members Joe Melnick and Lucy Ball reflect on what makes the Cape Cod Model so impactful and the program so enduring after more than four decades of practice.
By Roderick Allen, PCC • May 30, 2025
 Dear GISC Faculty, Staff, and Members, I am deeply honored to have been asked to lead the GISC Board as the new Chair. GISC is an organization that has profoundly shaped my personal and professional growth, and I know it has done the same for many of you. I am filled with energy and optimism about the future of GISC. We have an incredible opportunity ahead of us to evolve our programs, broaden our reach, and foster a more diverse and inclusive environment for both faculty and participants. As we move forward, we must also recognize the unique position GISC holds in today’s world. At a time when humanity and community face unprecedented challenges, we have the opportunity to stand as a beacon of hope and resilience. Our values of connection, empathy, and seeking common ground are more important than ever. By bringing our unique approach to communities and organizations dedicated to social justice and leadership, we can make a significant impact. The board has the responsibility of supporting CEO Laurie Fitzpatrick in achieving ambitious goals aligned with GISC’s mission. We must also work to enhance GISC’s presence, attract partners and resources to ensure sustainability and growth, and uphold the highest standards of legal, ethical, and financial integrity. I am excited to embark on this journey alongside the board, Laurie, staff, and faculty and look forward to what we will accomplish together. Warm regards, Rod -- Roderick Allen Chair, GISC Board of Directors Principal, Cipher Consultants (917)455-8994 LinkedIn - www.linkedin.com/in/roderick-allen/
By lfitzpatrick • December 18, 2024
Dear Friends, Thank you for your ongoing support of GISC and for being such a vital part of our global learning community. Together, we’ve continued to build on the transformative work that has defined GISC for decades. I’m excited to share some highlights of the past year and invite you to join us in shaping our next chapter. After more than 20 years in Wellfleet, we’ve embraced a new home in downtown Boston. Our new offices are located in a vibrant building dedicated to nonprofit advancement and social change, a perfect reflection of GISC’s mission to foster meaningful growth in the individuals and organizations we serve. While we will always cherish our Cape Cod roots, this move enhances our ability to connect with a broader community and expand our impact in new and exciting ways. GISC remains the place that brings diverse individuals together, in community, over time, for deep transformative learning. These shared experiences enable participants to multiply their impact for larger systems change. This year, our mission came to life with participants from 25 countries across all continents joining our online and in-person programs—an increase from prior years and a powerful testament to the global relevance of our work. In November, our faculty gathered for a three-day retreat, which deepened our sense of connection and reaffirmed GISC’s dedication to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. This retreat will allow us to better foster a sense of belonging in our programs, continue to develop our theory, and align our Gestalt approach with the principles of inclusivity and shared growth. We’ve expanded our program offerings to include new open-enrollment and customized trainings for organizations, addressing critical topics such as psychological safety and inclusive leadership. And we continue to develop new programs to meet the needs of today’s leaders and professionals. In 2024, we launched a free monthly series for psychotherapists, Conversations with Clinicians: Life and Practice through a Gestalt Lens, enriching our commitment to the therapeutic community. Board member Shanaaz Majiet from Cape Town, South Africa, captured the heart of GISC’s work when she shared, “I believe our GISC mission has new relevance in an era of relationships for a better world.” Indeed, the relationships we cultivate and the communities we build are at the heart of everything we do—and it is your passion, support, and dedication that make it all possible.
By Hortensia Hinds, GISC Certified Coach • September 24, 2024
When most coaches and clients think about coaching work, they see it as void of racism, sexism, sexual orientation, ableism, bias and intersectionality to name only a few experiences. They may also ignore the presence of these lifelong experiences in a coachee or themselves. As John Leary-Joyce the author of The Fertile Void: Gestalt Coaching at Work, states,
Show More